AMT LIKELY TO HIT
MORE TAXPAYERS UNDER THE NEW TAX ACT
10/01
While most taxpayers will see lower tax bills under the
new tax act, many will find part of their savings taken back
by a tax they may not be familiar with: the alternative
minimum tax. But taxpayers who may find themselves
vulnerable to AMT can minimize its bite with some careful
planning.
What exactly is the alternative minimum tax? It is a
parallel tax system originally designed by Congress to
ensure that wealthy taxpayers who sometimes avoided paying
regular income tax through heavy deductions ended up paying
at least something. To calculate the AMT, taxpayers first
calculate their regular income tax. Then they recalculate
under the AMT method by adding back many of the deductions
(called "preference items") and adjustments they took when
figuring their regular income tax. These items and
adjustments might include miscellaneous itemized deductions,
state income taxes, the exercise of stock options, home
equity interest, personal exemptions and a higher medical
deduction threshold. This is offset somewhat by the
exemption of a certain amount of otherwise taxable
income.
After the taxable AMT income is determined, the figure is
multiplied by 26 percent on the first $175,000 (married
couples filing jointly) and 28 percent on anything above
that. Although the two AMT tax rates are lower than the
regular income tax rates for higher-income taxpayers, more
income is exposed to tax. Consequently, if the tax amount
owed under the regular income tax calculation is less than
the amount owed under the AMT calculation, you pay the AMT
amount.
To date, the number of taxpayers paying AMT has been
relatively small, and generally in higher income brackets.
For the 2000 tax year, about 1.4 million taxpayers, slightly
over one percent of taxpayers, paid AMT instead of regular
income taxes. But Congress projects that number to jump to
2.7 million next year under the new act, 13 million in 2005
and 35 million by 2010! Some tax experts see taxpayers
earning $75,000 a year or even less potentially exposed to
AMT in the coming years. Especially vulnerable will be
taxpayers in states with high state income taxes such as
California and New York, taxpayers exercising stock options
and those using tax credits to offset regular tax
liabilities.
Why will so many new taxpayers be exposed to AMT under
the new act? In short, the lower regular income taxes go,
the more people fall under AMT because rates were not
lowered for AMT and most of the tax breaks under the new act
actually count against taxpayers under AMT. In addition,
some tax breaks currently protected from AMT, such as some
education credits and the dependent care credit, are
scheduled to expire at the end of 2001 unless Congress
extends the protection.
The new law provides modest relief specifically for AMT.
Starting in tax year 2001, it raises the amount of income
that is exempt from AMT, for example, from $45,000 to
$49,000 for married individuals filing jointly. However, the
increased exemption reverts to the old amount after 2004,
and there is no exemption increase for estates or
trusts.
As a taxpayer, your first step, especially while there is
still time left in the tax year, is to assess your
vulnerability to the alternative minimum tax. If you are
vulnerable, several strategies may help you reduce that
liability, though you may want to obtain professional advice
before taking action, because AMT is tricky. For example, a
typical strategy for regular income tax planning is to
postpone income and accelerate expenses in order to reduce
taxes in a particular year. But if you are going to have an
AMT liability, you want to do the opposite, particularly if
those deductions are preference items. It's better to expose
as much income as possible at the 26 and 28 percent rates,
rather than at potentially higher regular rates on that
income the following year.
Many commentators believe that as the number of
taxpayers, particularly middle-income taxpayers, find
themselves exposed to AMT, political pressure will compel
either reform or outright elimination of AMT, despite the
lost revenue to the federal Treasury. But until that
happens, taxpayers need to remain alert to this "shadow"
tax.
This article was produced by the Consumer Affairs Dept.
of The Financial Planning Association and provided to you
courtesy of Nigel B. Taylor, CFP, Santa Monica, California.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding this, or any
other financial topic and are a resident of Southern
California, please call me at 1-800-444-2237 (California
residents only please), or click on the "MORE INFO" button
to arrange for a free initial consultation in the comfort of
your home or office.
  
|