THE
PROS AND CONS OF INCENTIVE TRUSTS
02/01
Many of America's wealthy
families, and even many families who have accumulated more
modest wealth, are concerned about passing their assets on
to children who may not know how to handle an inheritance
financially or emotionally. Many parents are turning to
what's loosely called "incentive trusts," a controversial
style of trust intended to promote certain beneficiary
behavior by attaching strings to the trust
distributions.
Of course, trusts have long come
with "strings attached." One of the most common is an age
restriction. A child might not receive income or principal
from the trust until reaching a certain age, such as 25, 30,
35, or even later. This allows the beneficiary to mature, an
18- or 21-year old is less likely to handle the money as
well as the person would at 25 or 30, goes the theory.
Another approach is to stagger distributions over benchmark
ages, to give them the opportunity to learn how to manage
money well.
Today's incentive trusts,
however, often go beyond age restrictions. They are intended
to motivate certain positive behavior by the beneficiary.
For example, the wealthy often worry that their children
have developed a poor work ethic, having grown up with
wealth. Accordingly, a trust might provide incentives to
work by distributing money only if the beneficiary earns
money on their own. If the beneficiary earns a certain level
of pay, the trust might pay out a matching amount for each
dollar earned by the beneficiary. Some match a higher amount
the more money the beneficiary makes.
An incentive trust might pay
income or principal, or perhaps pay a larger amount or pay
it sooner, if the beneficiary graduates from college,
maintains a certain grade point average, does work for the
family charitable foundation, takes over the family business
or donates a certain amount to charity. Some trusts won't
pay out money unless the beneficiary stays free of drugs,
alcohol or tobacco.
In fact, many trusts can be as
restrictive as you want them to be as long as the
restrictions are not illegal. For example, you can't specify
that the beneficiary must marry someone of the same race or
that they must divorce their current spouse, though some
advisors assert that it is possible to restrict the trust
should the beneficiary marry someone in a different
faith.
The deeper issue is whether such
restrictions is a good idea. Critics complain that "ruling
from the grave" often creates resentment, even hatred.
Children resent being parented when they are in adulthood,
and incentive trusts are merely the parents' effort to
instill behavior and teach values they failed to instill
when the child was growing up. Some say such incentives
usually don't work, anyway. If the child is immature at 25,
why assume the child will be mature at 40 when distributions
begin? And there can be the problem of restrictions that are
vague, such as defining certain ethical behavior.
Proponents argue that it is
naïve to assume that a trust with no restrictions
doesn't also have an impact on the beneficiary. It's well
known that inheriting large amounts of money can create deep
emotional problems for the beneficiary. Why not set up the
trust to encourage positive behavior and positive
inheritance experiences? Proponents also believe that there
is nothing wrong with trying to instill values in your
children, even if they are adults. A key, they say, is to
discuss these restrictions with the beneficiaries before the
trust creator dies. This not only helps minimize
misunderstandings, but also helps them plan their own
financial life.
You can create a new incentive
trust, or add incentives to an existing trust. Many kinds of
trust can be used as an incentive trust: an insurance trust,
living trust, credit shelter trust, dynasty trust, a
generation skipping trust or a Crummey minor trust to
name only a few. Just be sure you have the trust drawn up
carefully, and that you carefully pick the trustee or
successor trustee (in the event it must be administered
following your death). These trusts usually should give the
trustee some flexibility for unforeseen circumstances.
Incentive trusts also often provide enough "safety net" so
the beneficiary doesn't become destitute.
This article was produced
by the Consumer Affairs Dept. of The Financial Planning
Association and provided to you courtesy of Nigel B. Taylor,
CFP, Santa Monica, California. If you have any questions or
concerns regarding this, or any other financial topic and
are a resident of Southern California, please call me at
1-800-444-2237 (California residents only please), or click
on the "MORE INFO" button to arrange for a free initial
consultation in the comfort of your home or office.
 
|