SERPS
BOOST EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT INCOME
03/02
Because of the contribution limits of qualified
retirement plans and individual retirement accounts, an
increasingly popular method to enhance the retirement income
of highly paid executives is the supplemental executive
retirement plan.
A SERP is a nonqualified retirement plan, which in
general doesn't have the same restrictions and limitations
imposed on 401(k) and profit sharing plans. Take a highly
paid executive in a large company who might make several
hundred thousand dollars a year. The most the executive can
contribute out of pay to a 401(k) plan is $11,000 in 2002
($12,000 if age 50 or over), and it might be less than that
under nondiscrimination rules. The $11,000 limit is
scheduled to rise to $15,000 by 2006. The employer's
contribution, plus the employee's contribution, can't exceed
$40,000.
Furthermore, under a defined benefit pension plan, the
maximum amount of salary and incentive compensation the
employer can base its payout on is also limited, to $200,000
under the new act. Either type of plan leaves a shortfall
for the executive, what's sometimes called "reverse
discrimination" because maximum qualified retirement
benefits make up a smaller percentage of the executive's pay
than lower-earning employees.
To compensate for this shortfall, many companies offer
SERPs or other nonqualified plans. A 1999 survey of Fortune
1000 companies by the accounting firm of KPMG found that 93
percent have SERP plans, though many aren't active.
A SERP is a contractual agreement with great flexibility.
Typically, the employer agrees either to pay in a certain
amount annually based on a percentage of the executive's
pay, or to pay out a certain amount upon termination (such
as 75 percent of salary), retirement or death, either over a
period of time or in a lump sum.
In a defined contribution approach, the amount set aside
is credited with tax-deferred earnings based on either a
fixed return or on corporate performance, or perhaps on the
performance of the mutual fund investments mirrored in the
employer's 401(k) plan. The executive also can agree to
defer current salary or bonuses, with the deferred amount
earning a fixed return or a variable amount. How much the
company agrees to contribute or the executive decides to
defer is up to the employer and the executive. The law
imposes no limits and filing regulations are minimal.
The plan is nonqualified because the employer does not
receive a tax deduction for the contribution until the
employee receives the benefits, which will be taxable as
ordinary income to the employee. A SERP can only be offered
to a "select" group of highly compensated employees,
typically not to exceed five percent of the company's
workforce.
Employers can pay for the plans in a number of ways.
About half buy corporate-owned life insurance. The employer
also can set aside cash, company stock or bonds on an
ongoing basis, though it has to pay taxes annually on the
income. Or the employer simply agrees to pay the benefits
out of company earnings at the time the payments are
due.
SERPs offer several advantages and disadvantages to the
employer and the employee.
For employees, the biggest advantage is that they can
fund a retirement plan that more accurately reflects their
high salary. There also are no regulatory restrictions such
as minimum distributions or forced withdrawals beginning at
age 59 1/2.
However, the big risk for the employee is that the
company won't be in a financial position to pay benefits
when due. The company can't set aside funds with a trustee
and keep them protected from creditors, as they can with a
401(k) or profit-sharing plan. It's strictly the company's
promise to pay up when it's time. In short, the executive is
an unsecured creditor. Furthermore, executives fired for
cause also risk losing the promised benefits.
For the employer, a big advantage is that the plan allows
it to reward a select number of employees, which makes it
easier to attract and retain highly qualified people. It
also can tie the plan to certain requirements. In a public
company, the only requirement usually is that the executive
becomes vested in the plan. Private companies also may
impose noncompete clauses or require the executive to
consult after retirement.
On the other hand, although the employer can't take an
immediate tax deduction for the benefits as they accrue, the
deferred amount shows up as a liability on the company's
books.
This article was produced by the Consumer Affairs
Dept. of The Financial Planning Association and provided to
you courtesy of Nigel B. Taylor, CFP, Santa Monica,
California. If you have any questions or concerns regarding
this, or any other financial topic and are a resident of
Southern California, please call me at 1-800-444-2237
(California residents only please), or click on the "MORE
INFO" button to arrange for a free initial consultation in
the comfort of your home or office.
  
|